XARMOURED
Loading the next view…
Loading the next view…
Manual-first penetration testing for web applications, APIs and mobile applications. We validate real attack paths, explain the impact, and help you close the loop with remediation and retesting.
Map identities, endpoints and the assumptions that connect them.
Scanners help identify potential weaknesses. Understanding whether a weakness can be exploited takes context: who has access, what the system trusts, and what happens when that trust fails.
See how we validate riskA useful lead. The access conditions and actual impact still need to be established.
Scope follows your system. Testing follows the paths an attacker could take.
Manual-first testing of authentication, authorization, business logic, input handling and the attack paths scanners routinely miss.
Test object authorization, authentication, data exposure, workflow abuse and trust between API consumers and backend services.
Assess Android application behavior across the client, local storage, transport layer and backend APIs.
Verify that remediation closes the original attack path without relying on screenshots, tickets or assumptions.
Define assets, access, exclusions, testing windows and rules of engagement. Establish how urgent findings will be communicated before any testing begins.
Next: mapSecurity testing is an engineering conversation. The finding matters. What your team can do with it matters just as much.
Explore business logic, authorization boundaries and the interaction between components.
Validate the behavior, document the conditions and state the limits of the assessment.
Give engineers a clear path to fix the underlying cause, then test that fix.
We agree on scope, authorization and testing constraints first. The assessment then combines manual exploration with focused tooling, validates findings before reporting, documents reproducible evidence, and ends with remediation guidance and an optional retest.
No. Tools help with coverage and repetitive checks, but the engagement is manual-first. Authorization, business logic, attack chaining and context require human analysis.
Potentially, but only after the environment, testing windows, prohibited actions and operational safeguards are agreed. Where production risk is unnecessary, staging or a representative test environment is preferable.
You receive validated findings with affected functionality, severity, impact, reproduction guidance, evidence and remediation recommendations. The reporting goal is to give engineers enough detail to act without losing the business context.
Yes. A retest checks the original attack path against the remediated system and records whether the issue is resolved, partially resolved or still reproducible.
Useful inputs include API documentation or collections, base URLs, authentication flows, available roles, test accounts, environment details, approximate endpoint count, rate-limit constraints and any high-risk business workflows you want prioritized.